Wednesday, August 16, 2006

NFP Revisited

Natural Family Planning (NFP) is in the Colorado Springs Catholic News (again!). Since His Excellency has instituted new Marriage Preparation guidelines, two points have come to the forefront: the length of time for the preparation (one year), and the NFP requirement. The Bishop's article on the use of NFP is a bit lengthy for a blog post, but I think that it raises some interesting questions.

From the article:

The reason why NFP education will be required is that this is the truly viable and moral alternative to artificial contraception and the growing contraceptive mentality ...

But for what do 90% of Catholics use NFP? Ummm ... that would be 'avoiding a pregnancy'. They are seeking not to conceive. Can someone explain to me again how NFP is an alternative to the contraceptive mentality?

The next part of the article expounds on Catholic teaching of artificial contraception. However, I do take issue with the following statement.

Contraception is immoral for this simple reason: it violates the dignity of the human person as well as the divinely instituted meaning of marriage.

Here we see the standard Conservative Catholic catch-phrase 'dignity of the human person'. I have a couple of degrees from a good (decent) Liberal Arts Catholic College. But I have yet to get a succinct definition of 'dignity of the human person'. In the Psalter, David (as a figure of Christ), says that he is but a worm. So much for dignity.

But we also have a bigger problem. The human dignity card seems to trump the God-Creator card. Contraception is immoral (nay, evil) because Man is placed above God in the order and timeliness of creation. Contraception says, "No thanks, God, We know better than you. We know that you want to act through us in order to create an immortal soul, but we don't have time for that right now."

His Excellency seems to get the point, but for some reason places the above 'human dignity' before the offense of God. Later on, he identifies the incredible gift which God has given couples to participate in Creation ...

God, in fact, invites married couples to a unique participation in the power of creation.

... but still does not actively recognize the sin of contraception is first and primarily a shunting of God's creative power.

Next comes the phrase that makes my blood boil:

While the church teaches that artificial contraception is always sinful, the church also teaches the necessity of responsible parenthood. Part of what it means to be responsible parents can involve the spacing of children in a family.

Did you catch that? Responsible parenthood. It's all well and good to preach responsible parenthood, but what are the guidelines of such? What IS responsible parenthood? I want a positive definition, not one of those definitions that tell me what it is not. My wife and I have 7 (seven) children, ages 10 and younger. Are we responsible parents? We go to Mass with many other families with just as many children. Are any of them responsible parents?

From my rant below:

There is a logical question that flows from the above. Am I somehow an irresponsible parent if I do not use NFP? Why is it necessary, as a citizen of a First World Country, to plan a family? [Disclaimer: Grave matter and/or circumstances trump my objections.]
Every time a friend or family member throws the spitball of "responsible parenthood" in my direction, I whack a line-drive back at his head with the above questions. And invariably, he ends up with a goose-egg swelling over the left-eye. The teaching of NFP also instills a contraceptive mentality, which forms the grave intent required for mortal sins. Remember, Our Lord said that if you even look at a woman
lustfully, you are guilty of adultery. So what does that say about those who use the tool of NFP as a contraceptive? [Disclaimer as above.]

Next, His Excellency gets into the concept of periodic abstinence.

When a couple conscientiously and for just cause decides that the conception of a child ought to be delayed, the couple may refrain from
sexual intercourse during the days of the woman's fertile period.

Good. He mentioned just cause. I think it should more along the lines of serious or grave, but at least he is qualifying the use of NFP. But you know what? If you have just reason for delaying the conception of a child, then stop with the lovin' for 6 months, not the two-weeks-on, two-weeks-off garbage. If you don't have a serious enough cause to give it up for 6 months, then you shouldn't be using NFP in the first place.

His Excellency then says about NFP,

it has absolutely proved itself to be a boon to marriages.

I have seen this statement a gazillion times. (And, yes, 'gazillion' is a word. Look it up.) My reply to this 'boon' is, "Show me the money!"

How has it been a boon? I call B.S. Every man that I have talked to about NFP gives lip-service to the "closeness" and "increased intimacy" mantra. The fact is, I am the man of my house, and I am letting some chart tell me how and when I can love my wife. It is frustrating, demeaning, and turns the man or woman into a begging dog 3 out of every 4 months. What was that about the 'dignity of the human person' again? Platitudes are nice. But reality is that NFP does nothing for the average marriage, but is a monthly point of contention for man and wife.

If you seriously need to avoid a pregnancy, then don't have sex, and flee from the near occasions. Hey, you did it for the year before you got married in Colorado and Kentucky-- you can do it again.

I am a Providentialist. (Hey! Don't look at me like I just used a dirty word.) I happen to take Our Lord at His Word, (or at least try to)

31 Be not solicitous therefore, saying, What shall we eat: or what shall we drink, or wherewith shall we be clothed?
32 For after all these things do the heathens seek. For your Father knoweth that you have need of all these things.
33 Seek ye therefore first the kingdom of God, and his justice, and all these things shall be added unto you.
34 Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof.

His Excellency echoes this in his letter:

We must trust that God will not let us down. He will transform the counterfeit into something better and more fulfilling than we ever imagined.

I just hope and pray that the use NFP does not become another measuring stick for orthodoxy. I have a feeling it already has.

Always a Joyous Occasion, Part II

Congratulations to Der Tommissar (and the Missus, of course) on the birth of Quarta.

Also notice that DT now uses a tiny little picture of a pint of Guinness as the site icon (which shows up in the address bar).

Cheers to you and yours, Tom:

Thursday, August 03, 2006

Peeve of the Day: Word Usage

I have seen this word used enough that I am beginning to think that it will become part of the dictionary.

The word is orientated.

People! For all that is good and holy! The word is ORIENT!

Let's look at an example:

I want to become more orientated to God.

NO! It should read: I want to become more oriented to God. See the difference?

The problem people have is taking the verb form of a word (to orient), making it a noun (orientation), and then using the noun form to cobble together a verb (orientated). Why do that? The verb form already exists!

So, please, all yous half-literate, I-can-post-shtuff-on-the-internet-now-and-have-a-voice bloggers -- do us all a favor. Keep an Oxford English Dictionary next to your computer and look up everyword before you type it.

But that will take too much time, Jimmy, and I will never be able to post a blog entry.

My point exactly. I stop reading your blog when I see the word 'orientated', anyway. And really, my standards aren't that high. After all, I am a member of The League.

Friday, July 28, 2006

Lebanon: Catholic Action Needed

[guest post by the founder of Angelqueen.org, John Grasmeier -- JtH]

Lebanon: Catholic Action Needed
By John Grasmeier
July, 2006

Link & comments: http://angelqueen.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8635
"For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood; but against principalities and powers, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places." - St. Paul to the Ephesians

The situation as it stands now

Lebanon is a country that was just beginning to recover from decades of suffering and civil war. Tourism, commerce and industry had finally begun to return to a war-ravaged nation. Instead of constant suffering and war, peace and relative security was beginning to gain a marked toe-hold.

After only a few weeks time, the dream of Lebanon's recovery has come to an abrupt and very tragic halt.

After Hezbollah guerillas captured 2 Israeli soldiers in an ambush, Israel implemented a pre-planned “plug and play” military operation that is now destroying crucial infrastructure and wreaking unholy havoc on a helpless and lamenting civilian population. In a virtual instant, dreams of any recovery have been dashed for now and for years to come.

As of the time of this article, hundreds of civilians have been killed - mostly women and children - while few Hezbollah guerilla (the supposed targets) deaths have been recorded. Hundreds of thousands of Lebanese are without homes. Thousands have been injured and nearly all business activity has ground to a halt. Transportation assets and housing has been reduced to rubble. What was once a recovering and modernizing society in the mostly devolved Middle East has been set back decades. In fact it may not recover at all. Even if Lebanon were rebuilt tomorrow (as opposed to taking many years), tourists will no longer see it as a travel destination and foreigners will be loathe to invest in its economy.

What a fine catastrophe to be created over two captured soldiers.

Holy Mother Church in Lebanon

Although it goes without saying that properly formed Catholics are always prayerful and concerned with such grave matters as war and human suffering, such a situation would not under normal circumstances be specifically to related to the faith or dealt with directly by most Catholic media outlets such as this one.

These however, are not normal circumstances.

Lebanon is the absolute last nation in the Mideast where there still exists substantial Christian population, or what’s left of one. Approximately 36% of Lebanese citizens are Maronite Eastern rite Catholics. If Lebanon continues to be destabilized or devolves into further chaos, there exists the distinct possibility that the Christians living there will once again begin to flee en masse, as they did during the scourging of previous tribulations when their numbers comprised over 80% of the population. We should be ever mindful that once this final bastion of Catholicism is vanquished, the Middle East will then (save for a few tiny remnants) be tragically devoid of any noticeable Catholic or even Christian society.

Our Holy Father, through communications released by the Holy See, has properly expressed righteous indignation over this human tragedy. All good Catholics should share his outrage, and thus far most have. Traditional, contemporary, Orthodox and other Catholic websites and publications have realized that our Eastern brethren and their families, who are mere victims trapped in this enormous tragedy, need our avocations, our support and our prayers.

Although many of us are Western Catholics who generally tend to hold many conservative political views (as does this author), you should not succumb to the prevalent groupthink that is currently infecting the “Israel can do no wrong” American/Western right. This flawed and dangerous mindset is being driven by factions that possess varying motivational inspirations, but shared goals. Two of the more prominent of these factions that immediately come to mind are the neoconservatives (who have largely hijacked and debilitated Western conservatism) and dispensational Protestants who adhere to the theologically absurd “rapture” heresy. Know that the neoconservatives are not your friends, and that the dispensational Protestant lemmings (and useful idiots of the Israelis)
would madly have a human disaster beyond all comprehension if they – God forbid – ever were to achieve their “end is nigh” unholy dream.

Although taking a proper Catholic position may cause us become somewhat isolated from many of our otherwise political and functional alliances, we are called first to engage the world as members of Christ's universal Church. This is not optional or voluntary. We are compelled by our faith to propagate Christian ideals, speak to injustice and condemn evil regardless of any worldly concerns or potential condemnations. Our faith is sacrificial by its very nature, and has been since its inception when Our Lord died on the cross.

What can be done?

Catholics are historicly a creative and dynamic bunch, who certainly don't need to rely on an article such as this for ideas to affect change. That being said, here are just a few suggestions:

· As our Holy Father recently implored, we must sacrifice, fast and pray not only for the victims, but for their "know not" victimizers as well.

· One of the first casualties of war is truth, so become well informed. Do not believe everything you're told by the media.

· If you're a writer, you should write. Bloggers should blog, speakers should speak and preachers should preach. We must gently but firmly insist to others that there is nothing goodly or Godly about the current evil metastasizing in Lebanon.

· If you have the means and you'd like to contribute financially to help ameliorate the human suffering in Lebanon, the Vatican website has set up a fund to accommodate such.

· If you are in a leadership position or have some other type of influence, use it. If you're a Catholic politician, do not follow the shameful example of some of your counterparts, who are too fearful, compromised or ignorant to speak out against clear evil. Do not throw your lot in with your spiritually-vacant and faithless colleagues such as Rick Santorum, who while attending a "Christians United For Israel" (CUFI) event threw his full support behind Israel's wrathful temper tantrum while standing under a giant ceiling to floor Israeli flag. If you are a politician or leader who is unwilling to work towards bringing about a providential solution to this horror, then please just keep quiet. Uselessness or weakness is preferential to sinfully exacerbating an already bad situation.

· If you are none of the above and all you have to offer is prayer, then please pray - and pray hard. Our Lord answers the righteous prayers of His children.

· Come together. Although we often argue amongst ourselves and our faith cuts across many walks of life, there certain times when we truly must be as universal and one as possible.

Whatever you do, don't just stand there looking uncatechized. Our Lord, Holy Mother Church, the world and most particularly our Catholic brothers and sisters in Lebanon need your help.

© Copyright 2006, angelqueen.org. This information may be reproduced at will providing the content remains intact and a link is provided to the original.


Whatever you do, don't just stand there looking uncatechized. Our Lord, Holy Mother Church, the world and most particularly our Catholic brothers and sisters in Lebanon need your help.

Monday, July 24, 2006

Always a Joyous Occasion

Congratulations to W of Traditio in Radice and his wife Monika on the birth of their first-born son, Marcel Baldwin. Apparently, mom and baby are doing well, and were due back home on Sunday.

My closet Feeneyite tendencies want to know, "Is he baptised yet?"

( I know the answer, of course. It has only been 3 days. But being a true Evil Trad, W will have him baptised as soon as possible.)

May Almighty God bless the W family

Monday, July 17, 2006

Colorado Springs Marriage Prep

Bishop Michael Sheridan of Colorado Springs has recently published a quick intro to the changes which he will be implementing regarding Marriage Preparation within the diocese.

In general, Bishop Sheridan is a pretty straight shot, but he misses the mark on a couple things. First, the good stuff:

1. The new policies call for a full year to be devoted to preparation for marriage. The reason for this change (from six months to one year) is to accommodate the increase in the amount of preparation that is called for. In our culture, marriage is attacked from every quarter. What may have sufficed as adequate preparation a generation ago simply does not suffice any longer.


One year of spiritual preparation is not unreasonable when you consider that most couples begin their "secular" preparations (securing the reception hall, planning menus, attire, etc.) at least a year in advance of the marriage. That is the time to meet with the parish priest (or deacon) to begin the more important preparation — preparation to enter into and live out a life-long commitment that is grounded in the bond that is created when a couple exchanges vows.


One year to prepare? Despite complaints from some in the diocese, I agree with the Bishop. I have previously spent 4 years within the diocesan-sanctioned Marriage Prep program. Frankly, it was abysmal. Marriage Prep was an afterthought for most couples, and then it was only an item on the list to cross-off so that they could have sex licitly. Spending one whole year preparing to receive a Sacrament that will shape the rest of your life is most prudent.


2. In addition to ensuring that the bride and groom are compatible with each other, a renewed emphasis on the sacramentality and indissolubility of marriage will occupy a prominent place in marriage preparation. Especially helpful will be instruction in Pope John Paul II’s "theology of the body." Our late beloved Holy Father has left the church the great gift of these instructions on the meaning human sexuality and marriage. We want all candidates for marriage to be exposed to this beautiful teaching.


I agree with the first sentence, the rest is just the Neo-Con party line that Theology of the Body is the greatest thing since sliced white bread. Every other teaching of the Church can be summed up in one or two phrases. "Jesus Christ is both fully God and fully Human." And, "By a singular grace, Mary was preserved from the stain of original sin at conception." Easy, right? So what is ToB? Can someone sum it up for me without referring me to a 400-page tome? And again, why should I base the rest of my life on it?


3. While some pastors have required couples to become familiar with a program of Natural Family Planning, this has not been consistent throughout the diocese. Mandatory instruction in Natural Family Planning will constitute a very important part of our new marriage preparation policies.


Yawn. Learn how not to have babies, the Catholic Way!


Among the threats to marriage in our culture, there is none greater than the contraceptive mentality that has become almost commonplace in the marriages of non-Catholics and Catholics alike. Forty-five years ago, when the oral contraceptive became readily available, it was touted as the answer to all the problems of married life. Now we know that contraception, far from being the panacea that was promised, has been a factor in the disintegration of countless marriages.


Agree completely. I got your back on that one, Your Excellency. But I have a problem with the next part ...


It is essential that married couples adopt a program of family planning and responsible parenthood that is in accord with the teaching of the church. Natural Family Planning is just such a program.


There is a logical question that flows from the above. Am I somehow an irresponsible parent if I do not use NFP? Why is it necessary, as a citizen of a First World Country, to plan a family? [Disclaimer: Grave matter and/or circumstances trump my objections.]


Every time a friend or family member throws the spitball of "responsible parenthood" in my direction, I whack a line-drive back at his head with the above questions. And invariably, he ends up with a goose-egg swelling over the left-eye. The teaching of NFP also instills a contraceptive mentality, which forms the grave intent required for mortal sins. Remember, Our Lord said that if you even look at a woman lustfully, you are guilty of adultery. So what does that say about those who use the tool of NFP as a contraceptive? [Disclaimer as above.]


The rest of the article is good Bishop-ing.


There is much more to marriage preparation than what has been highlighted here. Soon, when the new policies are promulgated, brochures outlining all the steps of preparation will available from your parish priest or director.


Sometimes couples preparing for marriage ask why the church demands so much preparation of them. The answer is simple. It is not because the church wants to place more hurdles for couples to jump. Rather, the reason why so much is demanded is because the church treasures marriage and family life so much.


If the church did not hold the holy state of marriage in such high esteem, she would care very little if couples were prepared for marriage or not.


It has been said by many people, and I agree completely: The authentic renewal of the church and then of our society and culture will derive from the renewal of marriage and family life. The family is the primary building block of any society or civilization. When marriage and families are strong, nations are strong. This renewal will come about when a new sense of commitment to the vows of marriage by our Catholic people and others of good will becomes a reality. Solid preparation for marriage will go a long way toward promoting that renewal.


I ask all couples who will be looking forward to marriage, as well as their parents and friends who want only the best married life for the couple, to see in these new marriage preparation policies the opportunity to ground their marriage in the rock-solid teaching of the Catholic Church.


May God bless abundantly all married couples and all those who are contemplating marriage.



Amen.

But I feel sorry for the Trad that wants to get married in our diocese. NFP? ToB? No thanks.

Tuesday, July 11, 2006

SSPX Superior General

Bishop Fellay has been re-elected.

Original is here:
http://www.laportelatine.org/accueil/accueil.php

(I haven't been able to access the site. It's not like I read French, anyway).

The Pope has BMs ?

From Athanasius Contra Mundum:

Instead ripping their [Conservatives -- JtH] hair out become[sic] some evil Traditionalists like ourselves (and we are usually termed neo-protestants because we don't believe that every BM the Pope makes is inspired by the Spirit) dare to suggest that their liturgy created by a team of liturgists is inferior to the Traditional Mass.

The rest of the post is the typical Trad rant justifying the existence of the Classical Roman Rite prior to the Second Vatican Council.

Yawn.

p.s. Is ACM allowed to use the term "Evil Traditionalist"? I thought these guys had a corner on the market.

Friday, July 07, 2006

FSSP Superior General

According to the word on the street, the new Superior General for the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter is Fr. John Berg.

Tuesday, July 04, 2006

American

Does being a trad or rad-trad mean you have to be anti-American?

(anti-Americanist, yes. anti-United States of America? NO!)

Friday, June 30, 2006

Regular Guy

Brian is a Regular Guy. Posts on regular stuff.

Since the latest craze in Trad Blog circles is the modesty card and women wearing pants, I thought I would post the regular guy's view on women wearing bifurcated garments. Basically, women in pants is a big PITA. I will let him explain his completely secular, modernist, insert-slur-for-non-Catholic-here point-of-view.

By the way, the Regular Guy Column is an entertaining read. Just ignore all of the soccer stuff.

Friday, June 23, 2006

Because I'm Irish ...

3 Brits die each year testing if a 9v battery works on their tongue.

142 Brits were injured in 1999 by not removing all pins from new shirts.

58 Brits are injured each year by using sharp knives instead of screwdrivers.

31 Brits have died since 1996 by watering their Christmas tree while the fairy lights were plugged in.

19 Brits have died in the last 3 years believing that Christmas decorations were chocolate.

British Hospitals reported 4 broken arms last year after cracker pulling accidents. (http://www.christmascrackershop.com  click tradition of crackers on the left)

101 people since 1999 have had broken parts of plastic toys pulled out of the soles of their feet.

18 Brits had serious burns in 2000 trying on a new jumper with a lit cigarette in their mouth.

A massive 543 Brits were admitted to A&E (is that the ER? -- JtH) in the last two years after opening bottles of beer with their teeth.

5 Brits were injured last year in accidents involving out of control Scalextric cars.  (model cars)

and finally...

In 2000 eight Brits cracked their skull whilst throwing up into the toilet.

Tuesday, June 20, 2006

Kreuz

Man! I wish I could read German. These guys look like fun. Almost like the Slashdot of Trads.

And, yes, I know they have an English section, but it just ain't as cool as the original. Why don't you thoughtful, mouthy, debating types head over there and start representin' for us ego-centric Americans.

Thursday, June 15, 2006

Heretic ... no wait, Heathen!

Tom has blogged on this earlier, but I am having my own little run-in with Mrs. Lovric of The Winnepeg Sun over at Angelqueen.

Lydia: Our baby is full of original sin. That's right. Not yet eight months old, our daughter has yet to be baptized and will therefore never grace the gates of heaven. Some will no doubt rebuke our decision to turn away from the Catholic church. That's fine. But reading the latest edict issued by the Vatican, my husband and I feel further justified in our resolve to raise a heretic.

JtH: Lydia, just for the record, you're an idiot. Five minutes of research would have shown you that you are raising a heathen, not a heretic. YOU, dear lady, are the heretic (and an apostate, for that matter). Having been baptized, you are dissenting from the Church
on a matter of faith and morals. Your statement is a textbook example of heresy.

Lydia: Sorry to disappoint you J, but I did not use the term "heretic" incorrectly.
The Oxford English Dictionary describes heresy as the following:

• noun (pl. heresies) 1 belief or opinion contrary to orthodox religious (especially Christian) doctrine. 2 opinion profoundly at odds with what is generally accepted.

So, we are indeed raising or planning to raise a heretic.

JtH: Silly me! Understanding heresy in a Catholic sense! According to the Catholic Encyclopedia (and St. Thomas Aquinas), heresy is

"a species of infidelity in men who, having professed the faith of Christ, corrupt its dogmas"


The Encyclopedia goes on to explain:

"There are, therefore, two ways of deviating from Christianity: the one by refusing to believe in Christ Himself, which is the way of infidelity, common to Pagans and Jews; the other by restricting belief to certain points of Christ's doctrine selected and fashioned at pleasure, which is the way of heretics. The subject-matter of both faith and heresy is, therefore, the deposit of the faith, that is, the sum total of truths revealed in Scripture and Tradition as proposed to our belief by the Church. The believer accepts the whole deposit as proposed by the Church; the heretic accepts only such parts of it as commend themselves to his own approval. The heretical tenets may be ignorance of the true creed, erroneous judgment, imperfect apprehension and comprehension of dogmas ..."


So your daughter cannot be a heretic, since she has not professed faith in Christ. I know the headline sounds so much cooler with the term "Heretic", but until she is baptized, she is a heathen.

Heathens don't sell copy, though.

Shmodesty

As has been noted elsewhere, the issue of Modesty has become a hot topic amongst Traditionalist blogs (and blogs) and fora (and here, too).

One interesting observation is made by Fr. MacDonald, an SSPX priest posting on the Angelqueen forum:



Tee-shirts are of course underwear. They are supposed to be worn under a shirt. For non-Americans, the tee-shirt is specifically American men's underwear. We generally do not wear "singlets." They used to only come in plain white, without any writing or logos.

The first big revolution was the V neck tee-shirt which allowed one to leave the top button on his shirt unbuttoned. It was very uncool in the 70s to button the top button of your shirt. With the shirt open you also could not wear a tie.

The revolutionaries then started to colour their own tee-shirts, tie die was all the fad, leading the manufacturers to make the modern
coloured logo-splattered tee shirts.

They are underwear and should revert to being underwear.

I have a book with photos of people enjoying an afternoon at a Perth beach. They are all fully dressed. It was a Sunday so the men are wearing jackets and ties. Probably many of them are Protestants. We must not forget that the entire Sunday belongs to God. We should wear our Sunday clothes all day out of respect for our Lord. This is as we go about keeping the day holy, especially by participating in the liturgy and performing the works of mercy.

Remember: To abstain from servile work and assist at Mass is only the minimum required to avoid mortal sin.


So, according to Fr. MacDonald, tee-shirts are properly undergarments. That makes sense. When shopping for tee-shirts for men, one would normally look amidst the undergarment area of the men's section. By displaying such garments in said area, the Western secular world (not only America) recognizes that tee-shirts are undergarments. (Is the horse dead yet?)

And again, Fr. MacDonald implies that not remaining in one's Sunday best throughout all of Sunday is proximate to mortal sin.

How do we explain this (original), then? An undergarment is on prominent display. The perfectly-functional button-down shirt is wide open. Is it ever acceptable for one (whether male or female) to have one's undergarments on display? Is this not flagrant disregard for the virtue of modesty? Are those who display tee-shirts "revolutionaries" as Father outlines above?

Friday, June 09, 2006

Breviary Reprint Rumor

Rumor has it that a reprint of the Latin/English 1962-1964 Roman Breviary will be available from Angelus Press on July 4, 2006. (Although there is no mention of it on the site.)

Baronius Press is also working on an Breviary reprint, to be available sometime this year.

Baronius and Angelus currently have 1962 Missal reprints available. Ahh, the sweet smell of competition.

Tuesday, June 06, 2006

Fr. Solanus Casey's Cause

Fr. Benignus of Sant' Ilario writes of his great admiration for Fr. Casey:

Fr. Solanus was certainly an extraordinary man, a replica of St. Francis, a real Capuchin. The wonderful spontaneous tribute paid to him by Catholic and non-Catholic alike is surely an ample proof that our traditional spirituality is still very much capable of winning the people among whom we work to a realization of the primacy of the spiritual and Catholic outlook on life. May he still continue to do much good from heaven, bringing many souls nearer to God and inspiring his own Capuchin brothers with something of his humble spirit.

-- Document III, Fr. Benignus of Sant' Ilario, 12 February 1958, Positio (I), 292.

Fr. Solanus Casey was declared Venerable by Pope John Paul II with the promulgation of the Decree of Heroic Virtue on July 11, 1995. Should he be canonized (Deo volente), he will be the first man born in the United States to be so.

Monday, June 05, 2006

Quote of the Day

When Jesus sends crosses and trials into our life, He is inviting us to help Him save the world.

-- Fr. Solanus Casey, OFM, Cap.

Friday, June 02, 2006

The 95 Theses of "Fr." Matthew Fox

Mmmmm ... I love the smell of heretics after lighting themselves on fire. I wonder, how far will this spread? Maybe Fox is on to something! The League of Evil Traditionalists need a "Traditionalist Manifesto", written under the name of Gazpacho Marx.

Everything below this line is sic.



Here is the offical St. Joan of Arc Catholic Church report on the event in full.

Come join us for the ceremonial nailing of the theses in the doors of all the Churches in the Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis.

For more information about this sanctioned and sponsored event, contact Father Dubrycker directly at:
"Father Debruycker" jdebruycker471@mac.com or jdebruycker@stjoan.com,

By phone

office: 612.823-8205
home 612 825-5811

Matthew Fox walked into the church at St. Joan of Arc on the evening of April 28th and nailed 95 Theses to a door in the church. His action was reminiscent of Martin Luther’s nailing his Theses to the church door at Wittenberg, German over 500 years ago. Don’t expect to see the Fox Theses nailed to THE door of the church. Out of respect for his venue and so that all of the 300 or so people gathered to hear his lecture could witness the event, Fox brought his own door!

Fox greeted the St. Joan of Arc community with the words “I love this church.” In fact when Fox scheduled several lectures in Minneapolis, he called St. Joan’s and inquired if he could also speak here. The theme of his lecture was “A New Reformation” which is also the title of his newest book whose subtitle is “Creation Spirituality and the Transformation of Christianity.”

Fox wrote the 95 Theses shortly after the election of Cardinal Ratzinger to Pope. By coincidence he had been invited to speak on Pentecost Sunday at the Bad Herrenalb Healing Center in Frankfurt, Germany. As he states in his book “Given these circumstances, I could not in conscience speak on the Pentecost of rebirth of the church.” He awoke early one morning and the 95 theses poured from his pen. The Theses flow from Fox’s life and “practicing religion and spirituality.” Fox described the process of obtaining a permit to post the Theses on the door of the church in Wittenberg, a permission that Martin Luther most likely did not need. The current rules require that one to stay 50 feet away from the door so that the view tourists have is not impeded. Fox thought the 50 foot distance was not conducive to reenacting Luther’s actions. So with persistence he obtained permission to post his Theses at the door itself.

Fox told his audience that he finds many parallels between Luther’s time and the present era. According to Fox, Luther’s Reformation was a product of a number of forces including the invention of the printing press, the rise of the nation-state, corruption of the Catholic Church at the highest levels and the rise of an educated elite. Fox contends that the forces at work today that contribute to a new reformation are the electronic revolution, the waning of nation-states and the rise of multinational, global corporations, the corruption and ineffectiveness of western religion and an awakened scholarship. Fox did not mince his words in characterizing the current state of the Catholic and Protestant churches. In the Catholic Church Fox said he sees “corruption at the top” and in the Protestant Church he sees “apathy”.

After describing the genesis for his Theses, Fox addressed the second theme of his book, “Two Christianities: Time for a Divorce”. According to Fox, today’s Catholic Church does not want theology, it wants ideology. Fox believes this is one cause of the priest pedophile crisis. Fox surmised that in the business environment, a CEO under whom such actions occurred would be gone the next day. Not so with the bishops said Fox. The Boston Cardinal was left in place several years before resigning and then transferred to a position in Rome. At the same time Fox noted that the three most read theologians were expelled from the church, an effort Fox said to dumb down the church.

Fox contended that the issue of homosexuality was splitting the church. He compared the issue to Galileo three centuries ago being tried and convicted of heresy for teaching that the sun was the center of the solar system. Both the nature of the universe in Galileo’s time and homosexuality now are scientific issues, said Fox. Fox noted that when Pope John Paul reinstated Galileo he said it was a lesson that religion should listen to science. When Cardinal Ratzinger spoke out against homosexuality, Fox said there was not one reference to science. Fox believes there are far more important issues to deal with than homosexuality, issues such as racism and economic imbalance. Why, he questions, do we let this issue of homosexuality take such energy.

Fox said he sees mainstream Christianity as a sleeping giant. “My work”, he said, “is to kick the ecclesiastical cadaver to see if there is any life in it.” According to Fox there is life after Roman Catholicism. But you don’t leave the bus voluntarily he said, just as Rosa Parks did not exit the bus over 50 years ago. But if you stay, Fox said, you should make some noise. Fox encouraged his audience to go out on Pentecost Sunday and pound his Theses on doors all around the city and to bring the media. Conservatives learned how to use the media, Fox says, while liberals were feeding the poor and looking at footnotes.

MATHEW FOX's 95 THESES to be nailed on Archdiocese of Saint Paul and Minneapolis Church doors on Pentecost Sunday!

Like Luther, I present 95 theses or in my case, 95 faith observations drawn from my 64 years of living and practicing religion and spirituality. I trust I am not alone in recognizing these truths. For me they represent a return to our origins, a return to the spirit and the teaching of Jesus and his prophetic ancestors, and of the Christ which was a spirit that Jesus’ presence and teaching unleashed.

1. God is both Mother and Father.

2. At this time in history, God is more Mother than Father because the feminine is most missing and it is important to bring gender balance back.

3. God is always new, always young and always “in the beginning.”

4. God the Punitive Father is not a God worth honoring but a false god and an idol that serves empire-builders. The notion of a punitive, all-male God, is contrary to the full nature of the Godhead who is as much female and motherly as it is masculine and fatherly.

5. “All the names we give to God come from an understanding of ourselves.” (Eckhart) Thus people who worship a punitive father are themselves punitive.

6. Theism (the idea that God is ‘out there’ or above and beyond the universe) is false. All things are in God and God is in all things (panentheism).

7. Everyone is born a mystic and a lover who experiences the unity of things and all are called to keep this mystic or lover of life alive.

8. All are called to be prophets which is to interfere with injustice.

9. Wisdom is Love of Life (See the Book of Wisdom: “This is wisdom: to love life” and Christ in John’s Gospel: “I have come that you may have life and have it in abundance.”)

10. God loves all of creation and science can help us more deeply penetrate and appreciate the mysteries and wisdom of God in creation. Science is no enemy of true religion.

11. Religion is not necessary but spirituality is.

12. “Jesus does not call us to a new religion but to life.” (Bonhoeffer) Spirituality is living life at a depth of newness and gratitude, courage and creativity, trust and letting go, compassion and justice.

13. Spirituality and religion are not the same thing any more than education and learning, law and justice, or commerce and stewardship are the same thing.

14. Christians must distinguish between God (masculine and history, liberation and salvation) and Godhead (feminine and mystery, being and non-action).

15. Christians must distinguish between Jesus (an historical figure) and Christ (the experience of God-in-all-things).

16. Christians must distinguish between Jesus and Paul.

17. Jesus, not unlike many spiritual teachers, taught us that we are sons and daughters of God and are to act accordingly by becoming instruments of divine compassion.

18. Ecojustice is a necessity for planetary survival and human ethics and without it we are crucifying the Christ all over again in the form of destruction of forests, waters, species, air and soil.

19. Sustainability is another word for justice, for what is just is sustainable and what is unjust is not.

20. A preferential option for the poor, as found in the base community movement, is far closer to the teaching and spirit of Jesus than is a preferential option for the rich and powerful as found in, for example, Opus Dei.

21. Economic Justice requires the work of creativity to birth a system of economics that is global, respectful of the health and wealth of the earth systems and that works for all.

22. Celebration and worship are key to human community and survival and such reminders of joy deserve new forms that speak in the language of the twenty-first century.

23. Sexuality is a sacred act and a spiritual experience, a theophany (revelation of the Divine), a mystical experience. It is holy and deserves to be honored as such.

24. Creativity is both humanity’s greatest gift and its most powerful weapon for evil and so it ought to be both encouraged and steered to humanity’s most God-like activity which all religions agree is: Compassion.

25. There is a priesthood of all workers (all who are doing good work are midwives of grace and therefore priests) and this priesthood ought to be honored as sacred and workers should be instructed in spirituality in order to carry on their ministry effectively.

26. Empire-building is incompatible with Jesus’ life and teaching and with Paul’s life and teaching and with the teaching of holy religions.

27. Ideology is not theology and ideology endangers the faith because it replaces thinking with obedience, and distracts from the responsibility of theology to adapt the wisdom of the past to today’s needs. Instead of theology it demands loyalty oaths to the past.

28. Loyalty is not a sufficient criterion for ecclesial office—intelligence and proven conscience is.

29. No matter how much the television media fawn over the pope and papacy because it makes good theater, the pope is not the church but has a ministry within the church. Papalolotry is a contemporary form of idolatry and must be resisted by all believers.

30. Creating a church of Sycophants is not a holy thing. Sycophants (Webster’s dictionary defines them as “servile self-seeking flatterers”) are not spiritual people for their only virtue is obedience. A Society of Sycophants — sycophant clergy, sycophant seminarians, sycophant bishops, sycophant cardinals, sycophant religious orders of Opus Dei, Legioneers of Christ and Communion and Liberation, and the sycophant press--do not represent in any way the teachings or the person of the historical Jesus who chose to stand up to power rather than amassing it.

31. Vows of pontifical secrecy are a certain way to corruption and cover-up in the church as in any human organization.

32. Original sin is an ultimate expression of a punitive father God and is not a Biblical teaching. But original blessing (goodness and grace) is biblical.

33. The term “original wound” better describes the separation humans experience on leaving the womb and entering the world, a world that is often unjust and unwelcoming than does the term “original sin.”

34. Fascism and the compulsion to control is not the path of peace or compassion and those who practice fascism are not fitting models for sainthood. The seizing of the apparatus of canonization to canonize fascists is a stain on the church.

35. The Spirit of Jesus and other prophets calls people to simple life styles in order that “the people may live.”

36. Dancing, whose root meaning in many indigenous cultures is the same as breath or spirit, is a very ancient and appropriate form in which to pray.

37. To honor the ancestors and celebrate the communion of saints does not mean putting heroes on pedestals but rather honoring them by living out lives of imagination, courage and compassion in our own time, culture and historical moment as they did in theirs.

38. A diversity of interpretation of the Jesus event and the Christ experience is altogether expected and welcomed as it was in the earliest days of the church.

39. Therefore unity of church does not mean conformity. There is unity in diversity. Coerced unity is not unity.

40. The Holy Spirit is perfectly capable of working through participatory democracy in church structures and hierarchical modes of being can indeed interfere with the work of the Spirit.

41. The body is an awe-filled sacred Temple of God and this does not mean it is untouchable but rather that all its dimensions, well named by the seven charkas, are as holy as the others.

42. Thus our connection with the earth (first chakra) is holy; and our sexuality (second chakra) is holy; and our moral outrage (third chakra) is holy; and our love that stands up to fear (fourth chakra) is holy; and our prophetic voice that speaks out is holy (fifth chakra); and our intuition and intelligence (sixth chakra) are holy; and our gifts we extend to the community of light beings and ancestors (seventh chakra) are holy.

43. The prejudice of rationalism and left-brain located in the head must be balanced by attention to the lower charkas as equal places for wisdom and truth and Spirit to act.

44. The central chakra, compassion, is the test of the health of all the others which are meant to serve it for “by their fruits you will know them” (Jesus).

45. “Joy is the human’s noblest act.” (Aquinas) Is our culture and its professions, education and religion, promoting joy?

46. The human psyche is made for the cosmos and will not be satisfied until the two are re-united and awe, the beginning of wisdom, results from this reunion.

47. The four paths named in the creation spiritual tradition more fully name the mystical/prophetic spiritual journey of Jesus and the Jewish tradition than do the three paths of purgation, illumination and union which do not derive from the Jewish and Biblical tradition.

48. Thus it can be said that God is experienced in experiences of ecstasy, joy, wonder and delight (via positiva).

49. God is experienced in darkness, chaos, nothingness, suffering, silence and in learning to let go and let be (via negativa).

50. God is experienced in acts of creativity and co-creation (via creativa).

51. All people are born creative. It is spirituality’s task to encourage holy imagination for all are born in the “image and likeness” of the Creative One and “the fierce power of imagination is a gift from God.” (Kaballah)

52. If you can talk you can sing; if you can walk you can dance; if you can talk you are an artist. (African proverb and Native American saying)

53. God is experienced in our struggle for justice, healing, compassion and celebration (via transformativa).

54. The Holy Spirit works through all cultures and all spiritual traditions and blows “where it wills” and is not the exclusive domain of any one tradition and never has been.

55. God speaks today as in the past through all religions and all cultures and all faith traditions none of which is perfect and an exclusive avenue to truth but all of which can learn from each other.

56. Therefore Interfaith or Deep Ecumenism are a necessary part of spiritual praxis and awareness in our time.

57. Since the “number one obstacle to interfaith is a bad relationship with one’s own faith,” (the Dalai Lama) it is important that Christians know their own mystical and prophetic tradition, one that is larger than a religion of empire and its punitive father images of God.

58. The cosmos is God’s holy Temple and our holy home.

59. Fourteen billion years of evolution and unfolding of the universe bespeak the intimate sacredness of all that is.

60. All that is is holy and all that is is related for all being in our universe began as one being just before the fireball erupted.

61. Interconnectivity is not only a law of physics and of nature but also forms the basis of community and of compassion. Compassion is the working out of our shared interconnectivity both as to our shared joy and our shared suffering and struggle for justice.

62. The universe does not suffer from a shortage of grace and no religious institution is to see its task as rationing grace. Grace is abundant in God’s universe.

63. Creation, Incarnation and Resurrection are continuously happening on a cosmic as well as a personal scale. So too are Life, Death and Resurrection (regeneration and reincarnation) happening on a cosmic scale as well as a personal one.

64. Biophilia or Love of Life is everyone’s daily task.

65.Necrophilia or love of death is to be opposed in self and society in all its forms.

66. Evil can happen through every people, every nation, every tribe, and every individual human and so vigilance and self-criticism and institutional criticism are always called for.

67. Not all who call themselves “Christian” deserve that name just as “not all who say ‘Lord, Lord’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven” (Jesus).

68. Pedophilia is a terrible wrong but its cover-up by hierarchy is even more despicable.

69. Loyalty and obedience are never a greater virtue than conscience and justice.

70. Jesus said nothing about condoms, birth control or homosexuality.

71. A church that is more preoccupied with sexual wrongs than with wrongs of injustice is itself sick.

72. Since homosexuality is found among 464 species and in 8 percent of any given human population, it is altogether natural for those who are born that way and is a gift from God and nature to the greater community.

73. Homophobia in any form is a serious sin against love of neighbor, a sin of ignorance of the richness and diversity of God’s creation as well as a sin of exclusion.

74. Racism, Sexism and militarism are also serious sins.

75. Poverty for the many and luxury for the few is not right or sustainable.

76. Consumerism is today’s version of gluttony and needs to be confronted by creating an economic system that works for all peoples and all earth’s creatures.

77. Seminaries as we know them, with their excessive emphasis on left-brain work, often kill and corrupt the mystical soul of the young instead of encouraging the mysticism and prophetic consciousness that is there. They should be replaced by wisdom schools.

78. Inner work is required of us all. Therefore spiritual practices of meditation should be available to all and this helps in calming the reptilian brain. Silence or contemplation and learning to be still can and ought to be taught to all children and adults.

79. Outer work needs to flow from our inner work just as action flows from non-action and true action from being.

80. A wise test of right action is this: What is the effect of this action on people seven generations from today?

81. Another test of right action is this: Is what I am doing, is what we are doing, beautiful or not?

82. Eros, the passion for living, is a virtue that combats acedia or the lack of energy to begin new things and is also expressed as depression, cynicism or sloth (also known as “couchpotatoitis”).

83. The Dark Night of the Soul descends on us all and the proper response is not addiction such as shopping, alcohol, drugs, TV, sex or religion but rather to be with the darkness and learn from it.

84.The Dark Night of the Soul is a learning place of great depth. Stillness is required.

85. Not only is there a Dark Night of the Soul but also a Dark Night of Society and a Dark Night of our Species.

86. Chaos is a friend and a teacher and an integral part or prelude to new birth. Therefore it is not to be feared or compulsively controlled.

87. Authentic science can and must be one of humanity’s sources of wisdom for it is a source of sacred awe, of childlike wonder, and of truth.

88. When science teaches that matter is “frozen light” (physicist David Bohm) it is freeing human thought from scapegoating flesh as something evil and instead reassuring us that all things are light. This same teaching is found in the Christian Gospels (Christ is the light in all things) and in Buddhist teaching (the Buddha nature is in all things). Therefore, flesh does not sin; it is our choices that are
sometimes off center.

89. The proper objects of the human heart are truth and justice (Aquinas) and all people have a right to these through healthy education and healthy government.

90. "God” is only one name for the Divine One and there are an infinite number of names for God and Godhead and still God “has no name and will never be given a name.” (Eckhart)

91. Three highways into the heart are silence and love and grief.

92. The grief in the human heart needs to be attended to by rituals and practices that, when practiced, will lessen anger and allow creativity to flow anew.

93. Two highways out of the heart are creativity and acts of justice and compassion.

94. Since angels learn exclusively by intuition, when we develop our powers of intuition we can expect to meet angels along the way.

95. True intelligence includes feeling, sensitivity, beauty, the gift of nourishment and humor which is a gift of the Spirit, paradox, being its sister.

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

Lovin' the Spam

... no, not the kind in a can. Although this one should go in the can:

Catholic Underground Texas sent me an "invitation" to attend their conference in Irving, Texas. If you are keeping track, that is a 718 miles (or 1155.5 kilometers for you metric folks in Canada). Google says that it is a 12 1/2 hour trip by car.

Ummm ... yeah. No thanks.

Being a Traddy Trad man myself, I figured I would look at the list of speakers (or performers as the case may be):

Strike One: Fr. Stan Fortuna --'nuf said.

Strike Two: Franciscan Friars of the Renewal.

What?!? How can you, Jimmy the Hand, not like the FFotR? They are doing awesome work! And Fr. Benedict Groeschel is doing great things for the Church!

Well, let's just say that I know a couple of Capuchin Franciscans. You know, the ones abandoned by Fr. Groeschel to start the FFotR. Apparently, when Fr. Groeschel approached the Chapter to tell them he was leaving, they -- of course -- asked, "Why?". He said he wanted to reform the Franciscans, of which the Capuchins are already a reform. They said they would like him to stay and reform through them. He said, "No". Thus the FFotR.

Now, the common sense part of me says, "Huh?"

My guess/speculation/judgment is that there is not enough notoriety in reforming an already existing order. So much for St. John of the Cross, or St. Theresa of Avila ...

Being an old-skool man myself, if the Capuchins were good enough for St. Pio and Venerable Solanus Casey, why not stick with them? But I guess it is the post-Vatican II need for a reform of the reform of the reform et cetera ad nauseum.

Strike Three: Performances by "everybody's favorite funk band, Crispin"

umm ... brain ... hurts ... must not ... try to ... c.o.m.p.r.e.h.e.n.d (Where is William Shatner when you need him?)

Strike Four: Phatmas

If you don't got a problem with Phatmas, then talk to my brotha the Inquisitor, he can tell you all about them.

But that is four strikes! Everyone knows that it only takes THREE to strike someone out!

Yeah, I know, but bass-playin' rapper Fr. Stan Fortuna is a screwball. No one can hit that one, so they get a mulligan. (How is that for a mixed metaphor?)

You can try looking for me at the Catholic Underground Texas thingy, but I won't be there.

Friday, May 26, 2006

Wikipedia Saints Portal

Not sure who else has seen this. There is now a Saints Portal on Wikipedia. It seems to have some potential for Trad influence.

Also of note is the Saints Wikibooks and Saints Wikiquote.

The only caveat would be Wikipedia's notorious Neutral Point Of View (NPOV).

Thursday, May 25, 2006

Ascension Thursday

The 1st Class Feast of Our Lord, Forty Days after His Glorious Resurrection ...

... is Cancelled Due To Lack of Interest...

... or rather, just moved to Sunday because the Roman Catholic Church in the United States of America is just too damned lazy to observe a Holy Day of Obligation in the middle of the week.

Tuesday, May 23, 2006

New SSPX District Headquarters

I recently read Fr. Fullerton's letter in the May 2006 Regina Coeli Report regarding the new location of the U.S. District Headquarters "located
northwest of Kansas City, just outsite of Platte City, Missouri".
For those afraid of PDF, the District Superior's letter also located here.

I am wondering if the true location is in Farley, Missouri. This would be a nice surprise, considering that I have family in that area, and would make my "Traditional Mass Commute" a 10 minute affair, rather than the 45-60 minute trek that normally occurs when I am in the area.

Will they offer daily/weekly Mass and devotions? Inquiring minds want to know ...

Friday, May 12, 2006

Catholic Church Break In -- II

Wednesday, May 10 was another eventful evening. Daily Mass was scheduled for 6:30 p.m. with Schola rehearsal afterwards.

Fr. F unlocks the doors at 6:00 p.m. to find the lights turned on in the Sanctuary (again), and the Sanctuary Lamp lit. ( The Sanctuary Lamp has not been lit since Sunday evening when the Sacred Species was removed from the tabernacle due to the security issues discussed here.)

Once again, the County Sheriff arrived on the scene to take a statement. All four officers whom we have met so far seem genuinely pleased that we have moved into the neighborhood and look forward to seeing the fruit of our future renovations. Deputy G from Sunday night (a self-professed fallen-away Catholic) is going to bring his wife down to the parish to speak with Fr. F.

Say a prayer for both of them.

Wednesday, May 10, 2006

I'm Just Saying

There is a wonderful phrase that allows one to spout off about any subject without any consequences whatsoever. The phrase is, "I'm just saying."

I recently got an email:

Now, I know cultures are different and all, but where I
grew up the guy who couldn't keep a girl didn't go around throwing
"fag" insults at others. I'm just saying.

The one who posted this is free from all culpability resulting from the insult. The phrase, "I'm just saying" is an indication that the speaker is stating the obvious, and therefore the listener should not take offense.

Another such phrase is "God bless him". As in, "He's a no good bum and a pathetic loser, God bless him."

Once again, we see that rather than insulting the person, the speaker is actually giving blessings to the subject. Therefore, no offense may be taken. Rather, the subject should count his blessings for the obviously magnanimous statement.

So, only a filthy wretch could find fault with the illuminating logic demonstrated above.

I'm just saying.

Tuesday, May 09, 2006

Bishop Finn: moving in the right direction

The Curmudgeon in KC has highlighted an NCR Article (a.k.a hit-piece) about Bishop Finn. Having grown up in the KC-St.J diocese, I found it particularly interesting.

From a Traditionalist perspective, Bishop Finn is moving in the right direction.

For the record, the Latin Mass Community of which the article speaks is located at Old St. Patrick's Oratory, and is staffed by the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest.

p.s. Funny thing. The "Worthwhile Links" section of the Oratory website has a link to the Curmudgeon's Cave.

Monday, May 08, 2006

Catholic Church Break In!

The Third Sunday of Easter was the first Sunday Mass for Immaculate Conception Catholic Church in Colorado Springs. Immaculate Conception is staffed by a priest of the Priestly Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP), and exclusively offers the Traditional Sacraments.

Following the 9 a.m. Mass, attended by 200 of the Faithful, many attended the other great Latin Mass Tradition -- coffee and donuts. The after-Mass socializing continued until 2 p.m. Fr. F then secured the Church and attached buildings so that he could make is regular Communion calls, leaving the property at 4 p.m.

Following his calls, Fr. F stopped by the homestead to unwind from the busy day and partake of the feeding of the Clann with baked spaghetti.

Upon returning to the Church, he noticed that the sanctuary lights were on. After going inside to investigate, he immediately called me to come down to the Church. We found that two votive candles with brass holders were missing, one from in front of a picture of Our Lady, and one from in front of a picture of Our Lord. The Paschal Candle was also turned in an odd fashion. Fr. F then called the police, and three armed county deputies soon arrived. They proceeded to "clear" the property, and then gave us a walk-though detailing their discoveries.

A window in the reception hall had been kicked in, indicating the point of entry. The door to the accessibility ramp was ajar, showing the point of departure. In addition to the stolen items, graffiti was found on the wall in one of the classrooms.

The Deputies said that there is a "gang" in the area that has previously broken in to this building, looking for cash and other easily-sold items. They recommended some additional security measures and assured us of their ongoing diligence in this area.

We are now in the process of upgrading our building security.

Tuesday, May 02, 2006

Athanasian Creed

GFvonB at Traditio in Radice has posted my favorite Creed of the Church (in both Latin and the Vulgar). In the Traditional Breviaries, this Creed is said following the psalms of Prime on Trinity Sunday. Sadly, it is very much overlooked in these times. I wonder what would happen if your friendly neighborhood Novus Ordo priest were to read this Creed from the pulpit:

  • His head would explode, covering the guitar player(s) in brain matter
  • "Extraordinary" Ministers of the Eucharist would light the pews on fire and storm the pulpit
  • 75% of the parish would immediately seek out the priest after Mass to hear their confessions. They have seen the error of their ways and wish to repent.
You can decide for yourself, based on your own parish experience.

Wednesday, April 26, 2006

Trads: No Fun for You!

W has a guest post over at Stephen Heiner's TrueRestoration.com regarding sport and celebrity. Overall, a pretty good post, but I admit that I shriek in terror (but not like a little girl) at the conclusion:

But I think that attending professional sporting events still ought to
be avoided because of the potential messages it sends our children. We
are, in a way, buying into the sport hero worship.

Can we Trads not have any fun?!?

I think that informing the conscience of the Faithful is a far more effective approach. What really is wrong with taking my sons to a Saturday afternoon Major League Baseball (MLB) game? Yes, I know that the food and beverages are extremely overpriced. But there is nothing like sitting in a stadium with 10,000 of my new best friends to cheer on the home team.

How are Trads going to witness to and convert the world when we will have no part of it? Are we just supposed to sit at home with our rosaries and pontificating on the blogosphere? The Great Commission has suddenly become the Great-Avoid-Everything-Of-The-World. Is Trad fun limited to board games? I certainly hope not! (I do enjoy board games, by the way. And I agree with W that Settlers of Catan is one of the better games out there).

So in honor of W, I am going home this evening to drink some beer, wine, & whiskey (not necessarily in that order), smoke a Marlboro, and plan my next sporting event with my sons. American boys without baseball ... what is the world coming to?

Tuesday, April 04, 2006

News :: AQ Exclusive: An Interview with His Excellency Bp. Rifan

Servitium at the AngelQueen forums has another Episcopal interview. The site seems to be down, so here is the interview in its entirety:

News :: AQ EXclusive: An Interview with His Excellency Bp. Rifan

AQ Exclusive:

An Interview with His Excellency, Bishop Rifan

A very candid conversation with the traditional Bishop of the Diocese of Campos

I recently received a call from our "French Connection", who contributes greatly to Angelqueen.org but still wishes to remain anonymous. From this point forward we'll refer to him as "FC". FC often calls just to chat, but just as often the purpose of his contact goes beyond friendly conversation. This was one of those times.

Recently, Bishop Rifan had spent some time in Europe where he gave several semi-private and public talks. It was at one of these talks in France that FC - having an uncanny knack for being in the right place at the right time - managed to strike up a conversation with His Excellency and build enough rapport in a short period of time to convince the good bishop to agree to an exclusive interview with AQ.

After FC informed me of the development, I gave it some thought and told him that although I appreciated His Excellency's generosity, if the interview was to occur, I wasn't about to toss him a bunch of softballs for him to hit out of the park. Of course I would be kind and give due respect to Bishop Rifan, but there were many lingering questions I and other traditionalists would like for him to answer. FC agreed this was the correct approach.

After some further discussion with FC and getting further input from him on what type of questions should be asked, I put together the questions. However, after reading though them, I feared that because some of the questions touched on delicate and controversial topics, that His Excellency would become angry or perhaps immediately send my email to his "deleted items" folder. This turned out not to be the case.

Very shortly (literally hours) after I somewhat apprehensively hit "send", I received a kind reply directly from the good bishop himself, blessing me and thanking me for the opportunity to be interviewed. No auto-responders or assistants, and no hesitation whatsoever to tackle the interview. I was immediately impressed.

When I got the interview back from Bishop Rifan, I realized that he not only answered every question posed to him, but he answered them thoroughly and with due care. Although he is a very busy man, he took the necessary time to give an excellent interview. At times, he is plucky and direct, but honest and forthcoming.

Enjoy.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


AQ: You recently gave several talks in Europe, one attended by several hundred people. What was the purpose of your trip? Did you find it fruitful?

Bishop Rifan: Three things:

1) The purpose of my trip
2) The message of my conferences
3) The contacts and fruits.

The purpose
I have some friends there -- priests who just fixed their irregular canonical situation, and they invited me to help them with some suggestions or advise regarding the path to follow. I accepted this invitation as a way of being charitable with them, as the Holy Father Benedict XVI told me during the meeting I had with him. What he had told me as a cardinal -- is that the Campos Apostolic Administration is an example for all the groups attached to traditional liturgy, on how to maintain liturgical tradition in communion within the Church. Cardinal Castrillon encouraged me this visit. The pope told me he is happy with the peace in Campos, between the local diocese and his bishop and us. Cardinal Castrillon told me that the existence of Campos and the life of the Apostolic Administration, with its independent churches and proper rite, in perfect co-living with the local diocese -- unity in diversity -- shows that this is possible. I think demonstrating that co-living is possible is a useful point both for progressives and for traditionalists. For progressives believe such is not possible, fearing unity of Church would be undermined if they open the door for traditionalists, and traditionalists fear the may loose their identity with this co-existence. No! Peace is possible with liturgical diversity, disciplinary diversity and of course fidelity to doctrine.

The message
A newspaper in France surmised my visit by writing: "Mgr Rifan appealed to unity and warned traditionalists against radicalism and fundamentalism." I spoke about how we must adhere to the Magisterial Church and I insisted on the necessity of communion with Hierarchy and the sensus Ecclesia. I warned them against mixing political issues and liturgical matters. Speaking about the crisis, I explained it brought wrong to the progressives -- and to traditionalists as well.

I said that if I were to speak to progressives I would repeat what Cardinal Ratzinger said once: "While there are many motives that might have led a great number of people to seek a refuge in the traditional liturgy, the chief one is that they find the dignity of the sacred preserved there. After the Council there were many priests who deliberately raised 'desacralization' to the level of a program... they have despoiled the churches as much as they could of that splendor which brings to mind the sacred..." (Cardinal Ratzinger's Conférence to the Bishops of Chile, June 13, 1988). That is to say: you, progressives, you are guilty of the lack of sacred and of the generalized desacralization in the Church. You are guilty of the traditionalist phenomenon.

But since I spoke mainly for traditionalists, I first spoke about the great qualities of traditionalists groups, of their great love for the Church, their zeal for sacred, and so on; traditionalists are "those who do not look to the liturgy for a spiritual show-master but for the encounter with the living God in whose presence all the "doing" becomes insignificant since only this encounter is able to guarantee us access to the true richness of being." (Card. Ratzinger -- for Claus Gamber)

But for the sake of truth, I also collected of the seven capital sins of the traditionalists, that is temptations and dangers where they can fall in, and sometimes do fall:

1. Pride - feeling like we have some exclusive and personal knowledge of truth, cultic idea that we are the only Catholics, the Church's savers.

2. Systematic lack of charity - "See how they hate each other" That's the contrary of what pagans said about the first Christians. The art of changing one's friends into enemies. The spirit of division.

3. Rash judgement - Spirit of suspicion. Conspiracy theory.

4. Scandalmongering - Criticism as a sytem. Ministery of criticism.

5. Spirit of dispute - Systematic disobedience. Independence toward hierarchy and Church's Magister.

6. Cultish group spirit - "no salvation outside of us".

7. Pessimism - against Christian hope (In spe gaudentes). To some point, satisfaction with the anormality of one's situation - and with errors by the human part of the Church - like if this could justify one's own position.

Contacts and fruits
I asked to meet with - as I usually do - the bishops of the dioceses I would be visiting. This was also a way of indicating to traditionalists the necessity of communion. Hence, I visited Mgr Vingt-Trois in Paris, Cardinal Ricard in Bordeaux, I had lunch with Mgr Pansard in Chartres and I was received by the nuncio in Paris. They all treated me like a brother. Mgr Vingt-Trois wrote me afterward very kindly: "I heard good reports on your stay and I thank you for the ecclesial words you spoke to the auditories. We pursue our pastoral effort at the service of communion and we put our efforts under the intercession of the Most Holy Virgin." I received many good repercussions of my talks. Many, many traditionalists have appreciated my conferences. I have spoken the truth of my convictions. I think I did my duty even if I could not please everybody.

AQ: Could you explain what the difference is between an Apostolic Administration as exists in Campos and a Sacerdotal Society like the SSPX or the FSSP?

Bishop Rifan: An Apostolic Administration, as exists in Campos, is not a group or a religious society or congregation, but is a normal and official ecclesiastical circumscription of the Catholic Church, the same as a Diocese or a Prelature or an Ordinariat, that is, a particular church, part of the Universal and unique Catholic Church. Because of that the Bishop of the Apostolic Administration has the same power as an diocesan bishop, in his jurisdiction.

AQ: As a traditionalist Bishop, how is your relationship with the other Brazilian bishops? Have you run into any political problems or other issues that may stem from your unique status?

Bishop Rifan: As a catholic bishop in full communion with the catholic church, I have good relationships with the other Brazilian bishops. I am present in all of the bishop's meetings and I receive all the consultations as would any other bishop while conserving my peculiarity and individuality, primarily regarding the traditional liturgy. The bishops respect this independence and this peculiarity of our proper rite, as the Holy See erected it. And because of this good relationship, we have many dioceses outside of Campos which now allow the traditional Mass.

AQ: Since the establishment of the apostolic administration in Campos, do you feel at all stifled in communicating your thoughts regarding the direction of Holy Mother Church, the Novus Ordo liturgy and traditional Catholicism?

Bishop Rifan: No. I don't feel at all stifled in my right of criticizing everything wrong in the Church. We are limited only by catholic doctrine or theology. This right is placed expressly in our declaration, according the Canon 212 of the Canon Law.

AQ: Do you have any authority outside of the diocese of Campos? Would you be able to administer confirmations in the United States or any other country? If so, what conditions would have to be met?

Bishop Rifan: I have jurisdiction in the full territory of the Diocese of Campos. My jurisdiction is cumulative with one of our Diocesan Bishop, with the difference that mine is personal and his is territorial. Outside of my diocese, as every any bishop, in order to minister sacraments I would need the approval of the local bishop. This is the way I have administered the sacrament of confirmation and the sacrament of holy orders in several other dioceses, in Brazil and elsewhere.

AQ: Your relationship with the SSPX was quite friendly before the Campos reconciliation, not long after it became less friendly. How would you describe your relationship with the Society currently, in particular with Bishop Fellay?


Bishop Rifan:
We were together during the conversations with the Holy See in order to regularize our canonic situation; We were even invited by them and were very grateful to them for this. When the Holy See offered them and us an Apostolic Administration they refused, and we in good conscience couldn't refuse this offer, or more to the point this explicit will of the Holy Father. After that, they began to attack us. They removed our Masses from the list of the Traditional Mass in the world. I sent an invitation to my Episcopal consecration to the four bishops of the SSPX and they refused. I offered many times myself in order to help them in order to get a canonical regularization, and they refused. This month, during my visit in France, a friend invited one of their Bishops to speak with me and he refused, saying that it was not necessary. So, I continue to pray for them.

AQ: If a Catholic lives in an area where a Novus Ordo church and an SSPX chapel are the same distance from his home, where would you advise this person to attend Mass?

Bishop Rifan: The attendance to the Sunday Mass is an obligation for every catholic. For me, of course, the Traditional Mass is better than the Novus Ordo Mass, so I guide people to the Traditional Mass. But the Novus Ordo Mass is a valid catholic Mass, of course. The Pontifical Commission Ecclesia Dei stated that attendance at Mass in an SSPX chapel is valid. The problem is the ambience. In the Novus Ordo, the modernist ambience must be considered and in some cases avoided. In the SSPX, the anti-roman ambiance must be considered and in some cases avoided. It depends on each case. As someone said me in Rome, the problem is not the rite, the problem is the sermon!

AQ: There exists a document called 62 Reasons Why One cannot, In Good Faith, Attend The Novus Ordo, published by "Padres de Campos" (Fathers of Campos). Most of these priests are now under your charge. Would you consider the 62 Reasons a document that the faithful should take to heart?

Bishop Rifan: There not exists this document, signed by nobody. There exists a list of reasons against the Novus Ordo, created many years ago, collected by a priest of Campos from many different sources. This document is not official. The reasons must be considered each one, and its authority depends of the document from where they have been collected. Most of these reasons are really artificial, saying, for instance, about the apostasy of priests, etc, with no necessary causal relationship with the Novus Ordo.

We can have critics against the Novus Ordo, but inside the limits allowed by the catholic doctrine and by the Magisterium of the Church.

AQ: It has been said that you concelebrated a Novus Ordo Mass on September 8, 2004 in Brazil. What was your role at the Mass? Were you at all disturbed by anything that went on at the Mass?

Bishop Rifan: In this day, September 8, 2004, it was a great feast of the centenary of the Coronation of the Patroness of Brazil, Our Lady Aparecida, for which all bishops of Brazil were invited, with a official representation of the Brazilian Government, and so I judged necessary to be present, mainly to show our public devotion to Our Lady, attacked by the protestant sects in Brazil. I have not concelebrated sacramentally: I was only present with the Episcopal ornaments, as the catholic Bishops (only the Anglican bishops, sometimes present by courtesy, use the coral vests, without ornaments, because they cannot concelebrate). But if I had concelebrated I would not have committed any sin, of course. I don't understand this scandal made about it, as I had committed a very big sacrilege.

But I think that the best answer of this question is already done by our spokesman, with my agreement, as follows:

NOTE ON THE PARTICIPATION IN MASS CELEBRATED IN THE RITE OF PAUL VI:

Some persons have questioned the occasional participation of Dom Fernando and some of his priests in Masses celebrated in the Rite of Paul VI.

Dom Fernando is a Catholic bishop, member of the Catholic episcopate, in communion with the Holy Father the Pope. Thus, like every Catholic bishop, even those of a different rite, he must demonstrate this full communion practically.

No one can be Catholic while remaining in an attitude of refusal of communion with the Pope and with the Catholic episcopate. In fact, the Church defines as schismatic those who refuse to submit to the Roman Pontiff or to remain in communion with the other members of the Church who are his subjects (canon 751). Now, to refuse continually and explicitly to participate in every and any Mass in the rite celebrated by the Pope and by all the bishops of the Church while judging this rite, in itself, incompatible with the Faith, or sinful, represents a formal refusal of communion with the Pope and with the Catholic episcopate.

The objective fact cannot be denied that the rite of Paul VI is the official rite of the Latin Church, celebrated by the Pope and by all the Catholic episcopate.

If we consider the New Mass in itself, in theory or in practice, as invalid or heretical, sacrilegious, heterodox, sinful, illegitimate or not Catholic, we would have to hold the theological conclusions of this position and apply them to the Pope and the entire episcopate residing in the world -- that is, the whole teaching Church: that the Church has officially promulgated, maintained for decades, and offers every day to God an illegitimate and sinful worship -- a proposition condemned by the Magisterium -- and that, therefore, the gates of hell have prevailed against her, which would be a heresy. Or else we would be adopting the sectarian principle that we alone are the Church, and outside of us there is no salvation, which would be another heresy. A Catholic, either in theory or in practice, cannot accept these positions.

Our participation, therefore, is based on doctrinal principles. And it does not mean that we do not have reservations about the new rite, as we have already respectfully brought to the attention of the Holy See. Neither does our participation signify approval of everything that may happen. To be united to the hierarchy of the Church and in perfect communion with her does not mean approval of many errors that grow in the bosom of the Holy Church, provoked by her human part. And, of course, we lament profoundly with the Holy Father that the Liturgical Reform has given room for "ambiguities, liberties, creativities, adaptations, reductions and instrumentalizations" (Ecclesia de Eucharistia, n. 10.52.61) and also has given "origin to many abuses and led in a certain way to the disappearance of the respect due to the sacred" (Cardinal Edouard Gagnon, Offerten Situng -- Roemisches, nov.dez. 1993, p. 35). Above all, we reject every profanation of the Liturgy, for example the Masses in which the "Liturgy degenerates into a 'show,' where one is tempted to make religion interesting with the help of silly changes in fashion...with momentary successes for the group of liturgical fabricators", as Cardinal Ratzinger criticized (Introduction to the book La Réforme Liturgique by Mgr. Klaus Gamber, p. 6).

For all these reasons, we preserve the venerable rite of St. Pius V, but "cum Petro et sub Petro", in full communion.

Pe. Gaspar Samuel Coimbra Pelegrini

Spokesman of the Apostolic Administration


Perhaps, another question, linked to that, is why we conserve and celebrate the Traditional Mass, what are the thru reasons. Because of that, I think it is good to add this explanation, I published in our bulletin:

Why do we love, preserve and prefer the classic liturgical form of Roman rite, The Traditional Mass?

Would it be only because we are nostalgic or sentimentally attached to past forms of liturgy? Only this reason would be not enough.

Would it be because we deny the power of the Pope to modify and promulgate liturgical laws? It would be against supreme Pope's power dogma!

Would it be because we just consider the New Mass, or Paul VI's Mass, invalid, heterodox, sinful, sacrilegious or not catholic? These statements would be against Church's indefectibility dogma and unity of cult dogma, and they have already received the Teaching Church's anathema, so it is an universal liturgical law, promulgated by Church's supreme authority 34 years ago and adopted unanimously by the whole Teaching Church.

The real reasons are:

for a question of better and more precise expression of our Faith in Eucharistic dogmas,

for safety, for protection against abuses,

for the good of whole Church, in contribution for liturgical crisis' reform,

for wealth and solemnity of rites,

for better precision and rigidity of rubrics (giving no space to "ambiguities, liberties, creativities, adaptations, reductions and instrumentalizations", as complains the Pope - Ecclesia of Eucharistia, n. 10, 52, 61),

for the sense of sacredness,

more wealth and precision of prayers' formulas, in reverence,

for personal and ritual humility,

for elevation and nobility of ceremonies,

for respect, beauty, good taste, piety, sacred language, tradition

and legitimate right recognized by Church's Supreme Authority.


AQ: Your Lordship's final message.

Bishop Rifan: I think that the present crisis is mainly a crisis of Faith, of Hope and or Charity. Lack of Faith in the Church, in his divinity and indefectibility - to look too much the human part or the Church, forgetting his divine part. Because of that, lack of hope and, consequently lack of love of God, lack of love for the Church as our family and lack of charity for the brothers. Prayer and spirit of Faith, this is the solution.

© Copyright 2006, angelqueen.org. This information may be reproduced at will providing the content remains intact and a link is provided to the original.

Friday, March 31, 2006

Tolerance at Its Finest

Here is a recent post from the Cornell Society. It is a prayer for peace to be said between the decades of the Most Holy Rosary.


  • Do we have pagans in our nation?

  • Do evil minds persecute the Lord God?

  • Have I offered prayers with distraction?


Answering YES to any of the above questions demonstrates the necessity of this prayer. So make a copy of this prayer and share the love.

The original post has a scanned image of the prayer card. However, as stingy as I am, I will post only the text.

Inter-decade Prayer of Rosary for Peace (17 November 1948)

Lord Jesus Christ, forgive our sins, take care of the pagans for the peace of our nation and lead the evil minds among them who persecute [the] Lord God onto the just path, redeem Russia for the peace of the world. Sacred Heart of [our] Lord Jesus Christ, Immaculate Heart of [the] Virgin Mary, make our hearts like the heart of our Lord.

Make this world free of evil inhabitants and tolerate our prayers offered with distraction. The most Sacred Heart of [our] Lord Jesus Christ, the Most Immaculate Heart of [the] Virgin Mary make our hearts fervent.

Imprimatur: Bishop Daniel H. Tji

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Spinster

A very Happy Birthday to the spinster Miss Hilary Jane Margaret White, a founder of the League of Evil Traditionalistas.

Happy Susie Day to one and all.

Thursday, March 09, 2006

Which Star Trek Character Are You?

Scotty
Scotty. You are a miracle worker in the eyes of other people and you are always able to perform them too, but your repair times just get longer and longer as you grow older.

Which Star Trek Character Are You?
brought to you by Quizilla

Monday, February 27, 2006

Which Twentieth Century Pope Are You?

Pius XII
You are Pope Pius XII. You're efficient and

dedicated, but not very approachable.


Which Twentieth Century Pope Are You?
brought to you by Quizilla

Friday, February 17, 2006

Mammon: guilt-free

Ian over at Nobis Quoque has posted an image that really touches my heart. The pagan ladies next door can't keep their mouths shut about not-legislating morality (esp. in regards to abortion). I have posted the image on my office door.
Let the inter-office back-biting commence!

Thursday, February 02, 2006

Soul for Sale

'Tis a dangerous thing to do such things. The "auction" ends Feb-04-06 00:32:03 PST



Soul For Sale

Friday, January 13, 2006

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

I Am Not A Heretic

You scored as Chalcedon compliant.
You are Chalcedon compliant. Congratulations, you're not a heretic. You believe that Jesus is truly God and truly man and like us in every respect, apart from sin. Officially approved in 451.


Chalcedon compliant

100%

Pelagianism

67%

Nestorianism

67%

Apollanarian

33%

Monophysitism

33%

Monarchianism

33%

Arianism

0%

Adoptionist

0%

Docetism

0%

Donatism

0%

Albigensianism

0%

Modalism

0%

Gnosticism

0%

Socinianism

0%

Are you a heretic?
created with QuizFarm.com

Saturday, January 07, 2006

Frumpamentalist

I decided to comment on the recent modesty/fashion post going on with my friends at Traditio in Radice and Inquisitor Generalis. You should read the above links first. My comments below are merely afterthoughts.

My wife calls those traditionalist women who have adopted the Little House on the Prairie (LHOTP) look a "Frumpamentalist".

One of the problems with the LHOTP look is that it does not represent the Traditionalist way of life as either realistic or attractive. Who wants to look like a frumpy-dumpy housewife in order to "join the club"?

I see the goal as being one of "not un-fashionable" dress. (Excuse the double negative. I believe it conveys my point.) Modesty does not by necessity equate with un-fashionable.

From our own experience, people are amazed to discover that we have 7 children and exclusively attend the TLM. Why? Because we do not dress like we fell off of a horse-drawn cart. We appear to be approachable and relatable, and we are. They are then caught quite off-guard when my wife speaks about the traditional role of women within marriage and family. The question in their minds is, "How could someone who appears to be so normal actually be so radical?"

Several young families who have recently visited our parish were relieved to find other Trad families who dress and act normal, inclusive of modest and moral.